Aller au contenu
Menu
Français

Phi vs DeepSeek

Microsoft's small models trained mainly on curated textbook-quality data.

Comparaison des critères

Comparaison de Phi et DeepSeek
Critère Phi DeepSeek
Context window 128k tokens 128k tokens
License MIT MIT for code, DeepSeek License for weights
Open weights Yes Yes
Parameters 3.8B, 14B 7B to 67B
Provider Microsoft DeepSeek

Les lignes grisées sont identiques pour les deux ; ce sont les lignes qui diffèrent qui motivent la recommandation ci-dessous.

Lequel choisir ?

Généré à partir des différences ci-dessus par des règles structurées, et non par un modèle.

Choose Phi if…

Aucun des attributs enregistrés ne le distingue à son avantage.

Choose DeepSeek if…

Aucun des attributs enregistrés ne le distingue à son avantage.

Phi

model · Models

Phi is a family of small language models trained on a deliberately narrow, high-quality corpus of textbooks and exercises rather than on a web-scale crawl. It solves the assumption that capability requires scale, showing that data selection can substitute for a large part of it. It exists because it reframes the question from how much data to what kind of data, and the answer is useful when the budget is a single GPU.

DeepSeek

model · Models

DeepSeek is an open-weight model family whose published training methods attracted attention for reaching competitive quality at lower reported cost. It solves the cost question in training rather than in inference, which is where most optimisation effort goes. It exists as evidence that architecture and training-schedule choices matter enough to change what a given budget can produce, and its weights and methods are published.