Skip to content
Menu
English

Llama vs Gemma

Open-weight language model family from Meta, released for local and self-hosted use.

Feature comparison

Feature comparison of Llama and Gemma
Feature Llama Gemma
Context window 128k tokens 8k tokens
License Llama Community License Gemma Terms of Use
Open weights Yes Yes
Parameters 8B, 70B, 405B 2B, 9B, 27B
Provider Meta Google

Shaded rows are identical for both; the differing rows are the ones that drive the recommendation below.

Which should you choose?

Generated from the differences above by structured rules, not by a model.

Choose Llama if…

Nothing in the recorded attributes distinguishes it in your favour.

Choose Gemma if…

Nothing in the recorded attributes distinguishes it in your favour.

Llama

model · Models

Llama is a family of language models whose weights are published, so they can be run on your own hardware instead of only through an API. It solves the problem that most capable models are reachable only as a hosted service, which rules them out when data cannot leave your network or when per-token cost dominates. It exists because releasing weights turned out to build an ecosystem of fine-tunes and tooling around one architecture, and it is the model most local inference tools target first.

Gemma

model · Models

Gemma is a family of open-weight models from Google, published in sizes aimed at running on a single accelerator or a laptop. It solves the access problem for teams that want a capable model they can inspect and run themselves. It exists as the open counterpart to the hosted models, and its significance is that the weights are available for the smaller variants where local inference is realistic.