Skip to content
Menu
English

Llama vs DeepSeek

Open-weight language model family from Meta, released for local and self-hosted use.

Feature comparison

Feature comparison of Llama and DeepSeek
Feature Llama DeepSeek
Context window 128k tokens 128k tokens
License Llama Community License MIT for code, DeepSeek License for weights
Open weights Yes Yes
Parameters 8B, 70B, 405B 7B to 67B
Provider Meta DeepSeek

Shaded rows are identical for both; the differing rows are the ones that drive the recommendation below.

Which should you choose?

Generated from the differences above by structured rules, not by a model.

Choose Llama if…

Nothing in the recorded attributes distinguishes it in your favour.

Choose DeepSeek if…

Nothing in the recorded attributes distinguishes it in your favour.

Llama

model · Models

Llama is a family of language models whose weights are published, so they can be run on your own hardware instead of only through an API. It solves the problem that most capable models are reachable only as a hosted service, which rules them out when data cannot leave your network or when per-token cost dominates. It exists because releasing weights turned out to build an ecosystem of fine-tunes and tooling around one architecture, and it is the model most local inference tools target first.

DeepSeek

model · Models

DeepSeek is an open-weight model family whose published training methods attracted attention for reaching competitive quality at lower reported cost. It solves the cost question in training rather than in inference, which is where most optimisation effort goes. It exists as evidence that architecture and training-schedule choices matter enough to change what a given budget can produce, and its weights and methods are published.